doug lea concurrent programming in java predicting outcomes

One is to argue that bad news followed by more bad news means Java will become a kind of COBOL, widely used forever but not at the cutting edge of anything. There are a couple of ways to look at this. Java's advance as a language has been too slow to keep up with Microsoft's C#. As a browser plug-in it has fallen behind Adobe Flash, the JavaFX initiative failed to win wide developer support, and on mobile it has also lost ground. Further, Java's pre-eminence as a pervasive cross-platform runtime has been reduced. While Sun was more friendly towards open source and collaboration, the JCP has long been perceived as too slow to evolve Java, and unrepresentative of the wider Java community. To set this bad news in context, Java was not really in a good way even before the acquisition. Another member, Stephen Colebourne, has a series of blog posts in which he discusses the great war of Java and what he calls the 'unravelling of the JCP', and recently expressed his view that Oracle was trying to manipulate the recent JCP elections. JCP member Doug Lea stood down, claiming that 'the JCP is no longer a credible specification and standards body'. Many members disagree with the Google litigation and feel that Oracle has not communicated well with the JCP. The JCP has been unhappy with Oracle's handling of Java for some time.

Without the test kit, Harmony's Java conformance cannot be officially verified.

Apache's complaint is that Oracle stymies the progress of Harmony by refusing to supply the test kit for Java (TCK) under a free software license. In mitigation, Apple is cooperating with the OpenJDK and OpenJDK for Mac OS X has been announced.Īpache has written a strongly-worded blog post claiming that Oracle is 'violating their contractual obligation as set forth under the rules of the JCP', where JCP is the Java Community Process, a multi-vendor group responsible for the Java specification but in which Oracle/Sun has special powers of veto.

Apple is averse to runtimes of any kind – note its war against Adobe Flash – and seems to look forward to a day when all or most applications delivered to Apple devices come via the Apple-curated and taxed app store. Although IBM's Sutor claims that this move will 'help unify open source Java efforts', it seems to have been done without consultation with Apache and is as much divisive as unifying.Īpple is deprecating Java and ceasing to develop a Mac-specific JVM. IBM has abandoned the Apache open source Harmony project and is committing to the Oracle-supported Open JDK. Oracle is suing Google, claiming that Java as used in the Android SDK breaches its copyright. The JavaOne conference in September 2010 was held in the shadow of Oracle OpenWorld making it a less significant event than in previous years. What is happening with the Java language and runtime? Since Java passed into the hands of Oracle, following its acquisition of Sun, there has been a succession of bad news.

Doug lea concurrent programming in java predicting outcomes